not too bad, but not as good as i thought i was
Always thought I have a pretty good eye for whether things are balanced or not, a picture hanging a little bit askew, deciding on the fairest way to divide something six ways (five siblings, you see ... ) I know I DON’T have an eye for wrapping paper around boxes, but otherwise, pretty okay.
Then I took this test: The Eyeballing Game, found on Matthias Wandel’s woodworking website via xBlog: the visual thinking weblog, and scored an average error of 7.63.
Hmm. I think I’d better rely on measuring with rulers and protractors and levels for the stuff that really counts.
Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on 01/12/09 at 12:11 AM
Next entry: when we were tested we refused to let this journey end
Previous entry: coneheads